Skip to content

Atlas · gst

When a sale charges CGST + SGST versus when it charges IGST — the place-of-supply test

Compare supplier state with place of supply: same state → intra-state, charge CGST + SGST (IGST Act Section 8); different states → inter-state, charge a single IGST (IGST Act Section 7).

Compare supplier state with place of supply: same state → intra-state, charge CGST + SGST (IGST Act Section 8); different states → inter-state, charge a single IGST (IGST Act Section 7).

Context

Every GST invoice has to answer one structural question before the tax line can be filled in: is this an intra-state or an inter-state supply? The answer decides whether the seller charges **CGST + SGST** (two taxes) or a single **IGST**. The flow above reduces it to one comparison — supplier state versus place of supply — and the IGST Act supplies the test.

The two inputs are the **supplier's location** (the state where the seller is registered) and the **place of supply** (fixed by Sections 10–12 of the IGST Act, which lay down where a given supply of goods or services is deemed to occur). Section 8 of the IGST Act defines an **intra-state supply** as one where supplier location and place of supply are in the *same* state. Section 7 defines an **inter-state supply** as one where they are in *different* states (or one is outside India). That single same-state / different-state distinction is the whole test.

When the test returns *same state*, the supply is intra-state and the seller levies **CGST + SGST** — the central and state components together making up the applicable rate. An 18% rate becomes 9% CGST plus 9% SGST; the central half flows to the Centre and the state half to the state where the supply occurs. When the test returns *different states*, the supply is inter-state and the seller levies a single **IGST** at the full rate — 18% as one line. IGST is collected by the Centre and then apportioned to the destination state, which is why a single combined tax replaces the split.

The most common error is using the buyer's billing address instead of the statutory place of supply, or assuming a customer in another state always means IGST regardless of where the goods actually move. It is the *place of supply* under Sections 10–12, not the address on the buyer's letterhead, that governs. Exports and supplies to SEZ units are treated as inter-state but zero-rated, so they sit in the IGST branch at a nil effective rate. Getting this test right is what makes the GST split on a tax invoice correct — and a wrong split is one of the cleanest ways to fail return reconciliation.

Cite this exhibit

Cite as

Falcon, "When a sale charges CGST + SGST versus when it charges IGST — the place-of-supply test", https://hrareceipt.in/atlas/cgst-sgst-vs-igst-place-of-supply, accessed 2026-06-17.

Licensed under CC-BY-4.0. Reuse the visual, data, or context freely with attribution back to the source URL — see /atlas/license.

Embed this exhibit

Iframe (full page with caption + cite-as)

<iframe src="https://hrareceipt.in/atlas/cgst-sgst-vs-igst-place-of-supply" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="When a sale charges CGST + SGST versus when it charges IGST — the place-of-supply test"></iframe>

Image (visual only, links back to source)

<a href="https://hrareceipt.in/atlas/cgst-sgst-vs-igst-place-of-supply"><img src="https://hrareceipt.in/atlas/cgst-sgst-vs-igst-place-of-supply.svg" alt="Place-of-supply decision flow. Two inputs — the supplier's state and the place of supply — feed a single test: are they the same state? If yes, the supply is intra-state and the seller charges CGST plus SGST under Section 8 of the IGST Act, splitting an 18% rate into 9% CGST and 9% SGST. If no, the supply is inter-state and the seller charges a single combined IGST under Section 7 of the IGST Act, collected by the Centre and apportioned to the destination state." /></a>

Parent newsroom articles